hi all

anyone alive here? :-)

chirino_m check his heart...

yeah Think so.

i'm playing around with 5.1.0 and msgs seem to be delivered more reliably with a prefetch size of 0, i only have one consumer.. any hints on things to checkout?

ttyl of 0 on the msgs too

prefetch size of 1 rather, 0 would not be good

[HypE]: why is that?

what happens when prefetch is > 0

just assuming 0 would not be good, i have it set to 1

well 0 is supported.

and disable prefetching

some messages are just not being picked up by the client

so when you call consumer.receive() then the client does a RPC to the broker to pull a message

much slower than prefetching

k, I'll try with 0 too then.. is there anything special i should be doing on the client side to handle prefetching reliably? i wouldn't think so

that's why most folks don't use it.

yea, gotcha

I don't understand my prefetching is not reliable in your case.

are you using a java client?

i don't either..i don't really know if it's prefetch size per se..but it does seem more reliable with a prefetch of 1

yea, tried with and without MessageListener

so java client right?

yea..java client

can you make a junit test case showing the problem?

yea, i got one, would just need to remove some junk from it

sweet.

if your allowed attach it as a contribution to the ASF in the activemq jira.. that we we can add to the test suite.

if you can't then just email it to me and I'll run it.

jstrachan: back home?

yea, i'd like for someone to review first maybe, maybe i'm just doing something wrong..but i've given it a fair effort

chirino_m: just arrived yeah

[HypE]: yep.

jstrachan: what do you think of http://www.nabble.com/.../Asynchronous-acknowledgements---are-they-correct--td17277656s2354.html#a17277656 ??

jstrachan: are you the owner for the nabble stuff for amq?

wondering if we should not use the embedding option nabble has.

you mean read that thread or look at the layout?

well both

:)

technically I think he might be right.

I'm having some trouble with my AQ 4.x instance. I'm connecting with 5.1 libs, but everything up until now has seemed to work fine. I was sending lots of data through it to another application (small, TextMessage's, but many message) over night, but when I checked it this morning things seemed hung. The app was still responsive, but ActiveMQ was not

I can barely connect via JMX, but I don't get ANY data, not even the VM Summary

and I am getting java.io.IOException: Wire format negotiation timeout: peer did not send his wire format. on both client and server

It might be related to the broker's memory usage as per activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org/msg05949.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org/msg05949.html

but I don't have out of memory exceptions

It the process is using up >12% of my memory (7857 RAM as reported by free -m), and

anyone have any thoughts on how to get things moving again?

Drizzt321: not sure I would need get my hands on it.

rebooting the broker is not an option?

chirino_m: the biggest thing, is that I can't even get anything to load up via JMX

well, it is, I'd have to restart part of the data load

which isn't too too far along at least

enable debugging on the broker vm

but it would be really, really cool if I could just get things to start moving

and attach a debugger if things get really bad.

how do you do that without going through JMX?