| time |
nick |
message |
12:27 |
<jstrachan> |
chirino_m: you there? |
13:54 |
<jduty> |
can I use the camel feature in activemq to have broker B consume messages from a destination in broker A and publish it to a destination in broker B? |
14:06 |
<jstrachan> |
sure |
14:07 |
<jduty> |
how do you specify a connection url in camel routes in the activemq.xml? |
14:07 |
<jduty> |
when I get it going I'll add it to your website |
14:08 |
<jstrachan> |
see the example here : http://activemq.apache.org/camel/activemq.html |
14:09 |
<jstrachan> |
define as many jms components as you like with different connection factories etc |
14:09 |
<jstrachan> |
just give 'em different ids |
14:09 |
<jstrachan> |
from("a:someQueue").to("b:anotherQueue") |
14:09 |
<jstrachan> |
etc |
14:12 |
<paolo> |
i got a question about network of brokers: if i have a MDB on machine A listening on queue Q and the same MDB on machine B listening on queue Q, how activemq choose the mdb on A or B to deliver the msg? i mean i know it choose only one, but which is the policy? |
14:13 |
<paolo> |
and is it possible maybe to define some load balancing policy? |
14:17 |
<jstrachan> |
it always chooses local consumers first if they have capacity |
15:02 |
<paolo> |
jstrachan, so if i'm sending a message from localhost to a queue and i have a consumer deployed on localhost (or attached to the same broker anyways) it has the precedence?? |
15:02 |
<paolo> |
and if all the consumers are remote? |
15:02 |
<paolo> |
it's random? |
15:04 |
<jstrachan> |
it favours consumers on the same broker to remote brokers |
15:14 |
<jduty> |
jstrachan... does it cost more to publish to a topic if you have more consumers on it? |
15:19 |
<jstrachan> |
at publish time not much really - just uses up a bit more cpu/network |
15:23 |
<jduty> |
network? in what way? |
15:23 |
<jduty> |
Oh right |
15:23 |
<jstrachan> |
sockets |
15:23 |
<jduty> |
sorry |
15:23 |
<jstrachan> |
;) |
15:55 |
<paolo> |
jstrachan, yeah, i mean, if i have actvemq on AS A networked with Amq on AS b and on AS c, MDB on AS a and AS b, and im sending on the queue from AS c. will Amq deliver the message to one of the mdbs on a or b without any special policy |
15:55 |
<paolo> |
? |
15:57 |
<jstrachan> |
activemq networks means that messages are store/forwarded to available consumers across broker boundaries, yes |
20:36 |
<Steve> |
Question about ActiveMQ functionality... |
20:36 |
<Steve> |
I am setting isSendFailIfNoSpace() to true in hopes of a fast failure if DISK is full |
20:37 |
<Steve> |
However, the code in broker.region.Queue only checks this setting if memoryUsage.isFull() is true |
20:37 |
<Steve> |
Should I file a bug, or is thiis desired behavior? |
20:38 |
<Steve> |
FYI, we are configuring a local bridge to consolidate server logs off a large number of application servers. We want to (1) not affect production by filling up disk and (2) not stop threads if allocated disk space is used up |
20:39 |
<Steve> |
But, we're willing to lose log messages in extreme cases |
21:39 |
<Steve> |
Anyone here who can answer a question about failover mode |
21:39 |
<Steve> |
? |
22:12 |
<Steve> |
I added 1716 and 1717. Please let me know if I didn't take appropriate steps before adding stuff to the JIRA |